Alcor, Cryonics Discussed on Boing Boing

pcbAbsolutely thrilled that Charles Platt posted two cryonics-related items to Boing Boing during his stint as guest blogger (haven’t seen Mr. Platt since that dark, secret meeting of death aficionados in Las Vegas back back in ’97 – what a strange and delightful time that was). Disappointed, though, that discussion of it amongst the Boing Boing crowd has been characterized by “ill-informed knee jerk reactions and negativity” – as one reader commented. Definitely not, as another reader mentioned, the same crowd as the original Boing Boing print ‘zine, the early years of Wired, Mondo 2000 or Extropy.

Alcor Foundation, the larger of two companies that maintain people in cryopreservation, stores cryopreserved bodies, heads, and pets in beautifully made stainless-steel cylinders known as dewars. These are vacuum-insulated (like giant thermos flasks) to minimize the boiloff of liquid nitrogen. …

Link to full Boing Boing article…

###

[tags]Alcor, Alcor Life Extension Foundation, Charles Platt, Cryo, Cryonics, Death, Entropy, Extropy, Freezing, Health, Immortality, Indefinite Lifespan, Life Extension, Mondo 2000, Vitrification, Wellness[/tags]

Responsible Approach to Cognitive Enhancement

This weeks issue of Nature includes a commentary entitled Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy which discusses the “growing demand for cognitive enhancement” through the use of pharmaceuticals and outlines a strategy for intelligently, morally and safely incorporating smart drugs into modern society.

I am no stranger to nootropics. Though I can no longer claim to be an active user of cognitive-enhancing drugs – save for my morning caffeine – I have a long historical interest, both personal and professional, in the topic. Just last week in fact, while searching through some of my archives, I came across an old ‘zine from the 90′s – Collected Letters it was called – in which appeared a small article featuring a long list, the title of which was The Chemical Additives of Roderick Russell. This may strike those who know me as a teetotaler as odd. Never have I engaged in drug use in the tradition sense – no smoking, no drinking – but peak performance of the human brain has always been a subject near and dear.

With such a long history of interest and involvement in the field – and I tell you all this to demonstrate that I do indeed have a very positive interest – one may wonder why, on the surface of it, I seem to be opposed to widespread use of cognitive-enhancing compounds. My own ’04 article on the topic seems at first glance to be very anti-nootropic – but that is only at first glance.

My concern is that by engaging in widespread promotion of cognitive-enhancing pharmaceuticals, we serve more to undermine the foundation of peak performance and the moral development of society as a whole.

I am entirely in favor of individuals having the right to modify as they see fit. I worry only that these individual choices may come about in absence of the educational foundation necessary to make a truly informed decision, and this uneducated choice may have wider consequences for others in society.

The commentary in Nature provides a well-balanced look at the many issues facing the introduction of cognitive-enhancing drugs to healthy individuals in society while also offering up a reasoned path for such widespread implementation.

Some of the encouraging statements found within the commentary (all emphasis mine):

The drugs just reviewed, along with newer technologies such as brain stimulation and prosthetic brain chips, should be viewed in the same general category as education, good health habits, and information technology — ways that our uniquely innovative species tries to improve itself.

Drugs may seem distinctive among enhancements in that they bring about their effects by altering brain function, but in reality so does any intervention that enhances cognition. Recent research has identified beneficial neural changes engendered by exercise, nutrition and sleep, as well as instruction and reading. In short, cognitive-enhancing drugs seem morally equivalent to other, more familiar, enhancements.

This statement is encouraging insofar as the authors recognize the role of more traditional – less pharmaceutical – methods of cognitive enhancement, but their placement of these foundational methods on the same moral ground as drug-based methods is simply wrong. They go on to address this in the following statement:

Many people have doubts about the moral status of enhancement drugs for reasons ranging from the pragmatic to the philosophical, including concerns about short-circuiting personal agency and undermining the value of human effort

It is exactly this undermining of human effort that I oppose. I feel strongly that one should work hard and focus on maximizing performance through the methods of education, exercise, nutrition, sleep, reading – all of the methods outlined above – as well as practice, and only once character and ability have been developed through these means – true building of character, not augmenting of character – should one seek to push further through drug-based cognitive-enhancement.

The authors recognize the importance of these other cognitive-enhancement methods. They intelligently incorporate the question of smart drugs into the larger picture of society, social morality and education. Unfortunately, I fear that there is a major gap that exists between theory and policy on the one hand, and practice on the other.
###
[tags]brain, cognition, cognitive enhancement, nature, nootropics, peak performance, smart drugs[/tags]

Flickr Stripper Saves The Day

flickrstripperHaving decided that I needed a decent moblogging solution for my self-hosted WordPress blog, I recently ran tests of several options open to me and my setup.

My needs were simple. While on the road I’m likely to post primarily photos and video with short bits of accompanying text commentary. No need for elaborate layouts, minimal-to-no links included and text commentary is – even with my legendary loquaciousness – usually no more than a few short paragraphs.

Preferring maximum control and self-contained systems, my first choice was of course to keep whichever solution I implemented as close to the core of WordPress as is possible, so naturally I investigated the WordPress-native “Post via E-Mail” solution. Unfortunately the system is, at least at the time of this writing, not handling images terribly well, though passing text through my phone into the system is working flawlessly. Alas, it was really the combination of photos, videos and text that I was interested in, so at this time the WordPress-native solution is not for me.

Not wanting to venture too far from the core of the code, I decided to explore several plugin options. There were many contenders, notable among them Brett Duncavage’s PostMaster 2.0. In fact, Brett’s plugin is quite good and handles images very, very well! There is a downfall to the plugin though, and that is the fact that – exactly inverse to the WordPress-native support – it does not handle text very well. This is no fault of the plugin author’s, of course. In fact, he’s worked very, very hard to keep up with and account for the myriad of idiosyncrasies that each cell carrier throws at him, but at this time the code is not handling messages from my carrier (Verizon) very well if they include more than, say, one short paragraph.


Venturing even further out of the WordPress system, I reluctantly decided to explore what options might be available via Flickr, as I have a Flickr Pro account that I use very regularly.

As it turns out, there are some great external blog integration options available through the Flickr system and, as I post most of my photos there anyhow and already upload via email from my cell phone, working through their system is quite convenient. It was very simple to integrate my blog and very easy to create a new private Flickr email address that I can use to post simultaneously to Flickr as well as my blog.

All seemed to be working perfectly, save for one thing; that is, the photos and blog posting appeared on Flickr just fine, but when passed into my self-hosted WordPress system the text exhibited an overwhelming number of seemingly random line breaks which in turn threw off the alignment of each entry, leaving it looking hideous, unkempt and difficult to read on the screen!

I searched and searched and searched for a solution and all I could turn up were numerous unanswered Flickr Help Forum posts (here, here, here, here, etc…). Many users were experiencing the exact same thing as me, and there was no solution to be had. In fact, many of the forum threads became closed due to lack of response!

The Flickr staff and development team has not been in a position to help much, as they themselves are rather stuck in the middle of cell carriers and email clients on one side and external, third-party blog servers on the other, each with their own proprietary setup.

Eager to get the system working for myself though I decided to take matters into my own hands and track down precisely what was happening.

As it turns out, the text going into Flickr is filled with new line indications that correspond to my email client’s limitations. These new lines then translate into an unusual short-width blog post on Flickr, though on the Flickr pages it looks just fine.

The real problem creeps up when Flickr then shoots the entry over to my WordPress blog for posting, where all of those new lines are replaced with HTML line breaks, and what then becomes rendered on my personal blog page is a hideous mess of text that breaks both at the end of the available page space as well as randomly throughout sentences!

There’s no way to fix this from the carrier/client-to-Flickr side of things (mind you, the Flickr staff may be able to implement a solution), so the best that we can do is to utilize our access to the WordPress side of things to write our own plugin to handle the resulting mess as best we can – and I’ve spent a few minutes this evening between travel and work to do just that. The result is Flickr Stripper.

Why is it called “Stripper”? Because that’s precisely what it does. It strips out all “\ n”’s and replaces them with “ “ (a space) so that there are no more random line breaks. Beyond that, it detects new paragraphs by searching for double “\ n”’s and replaces them with the HTML “< p >” tag.

Are there problems? Sure. It was written in very short order to do a quick and dirty job and, frankly, there’s only so much that one can do with the data that Flickr is passing through.

One such problem is that a genuine, bona fide new line can not be had. The plugin works great if you write in a general “full paragraph” by “full paragraph” style, but if you have text that you truly want to appear on new, single lines such as this:

This is one line.
And this is another line, with a single carriage return.
While this is a third.

You won’t be able to have it. The text will appear like this:

This is one line. And this is another line, with a single carriage return. While this is a third.

Unfortunately, the data does not give us any way to distinguish between bogus new lines and actual new lines. The only thing that we can truly detect are new paragraphs, as they give us clues by appearing as a double new line. So you can have this:

This is text in one paragraph. This is in fact the first paragraph, and in a moment you’ll be reading the second. The second paragraph will tell us that we can have as many paragraphs as we want, but that we’re limited in other formatting options.

This is the second paragraph. While we can have as many paragraphs as we want, we are limited in our formatting. For instance, we will not be able to have single new lines throughout our post. Paragraphs are all we have.

The third paragraph – this one here – tells us that thankfully, most posts of pictures and video via phone are unlikely to have anything but basic text anyhow, which means that for the most part, we’ve solved our problem.

Your mileage may vary based upon carrier and/or client. Users will undoubtedly discover their own idiosyncrasies, but the best bet is to just try it out and see if it works for you. It works great for me. The good news is that the code is extremely simple so adjustments to unique situations can be quickly made.

How To Setup Flickr Stripper

1.) Download the code here
2.) Unzip the file and place flickrzipper.php in your WordPress plugins directory as per usual.
3.) Activate the plugin via the Admin panel
4.) Setup your Flickr account to allow you to upload photos via email.
5.)In your Blog Layout (on Flickr), make sure that you use {description_raw} (the default is {description}, simply replace that with {description_raw}).
6.)Send a photo to your Flickr blog email address to test it out!

Feel free to leave comments, let us know if it worked for you or if it didn’t, and if you’d like to see something like this evolve into a more robust bit of code to support more options and scenarios. Who knows, I might just have a break in my schedule to make it happen.

###
[tags]Flickr, mobile blogging, moblog, moblogging, Plugins, Verizon, WordPress[/tags]

Eat Food. Not Too Much. Mostly Plants.

Journalist Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food along with four previous books, spoke at Google last month as part of their Authors@Google series. The video of his talk is up on YouTube and it’s incredible.

So compelling (and practical) was his talk that I rushed out to purchase his book immediately and it’s been worth every penny. In a world that has constantly conflicting scientific reports on nutrition, a government that issues shifting guidelines oftentimes in response to politics rather than data, and supermarkets filled with food-like products rather than food, how are we to know what to eat? And why in the world would we even have to ask such a seemingly silly question?

Pollan addresses and answers these questions and more in his book while also giving us – in seven words no less – very practical advice on eating and staying healthy.

Commonsensical, workable and safe. It’s hard to go wrong with the approach that Pollan advocates – and you’ll enjoy doing it as well.

Watch the video. Buy the book. Eat. Enjoy.

(thanks to Cory Doctorow over at Boing Boing for the link)


###
[tags]Authors, Authors@Google, Books, Diet, Eating, In Defense of Food, Michael Pollan, Nutrition, Nutritionism, Organic Food, The Ominivore’s Dilemma, The Ominivore’s Dilemma[/tags]

Fraud Exposed as Fraud

hardmanNigel Hardman, a 40-year-old “illusionist” from England was recently charged with eleven counts of cheating the benefits system (aka collecting unemployment, for those in the States) after his “act” brought him to the attention of authorities.

Performing – and I use that term very loosely – under the name Prince Razaq, he is said to have presented “death-defying” stunts such as sword swallowing, fire eating, walking on broken glass, escapes from straitjackets and standing on a bed of nails. Investigators apparently became curious regarding his claims of “too ill to work” – for which he was collecting benefits – after seeing him perform on the television show The Big Breakfast, clearly demonstrating that he was, well, not too ill to work!

I could care less about his cheating of the benefits system – that’s something that the authorities are now on top of. What really gets my goat is that this fraud is a fraud in so many ways, and a complete hack in terms of performing, yet he nevertheless grabs the attention of society! The papers – and granted we are talking about the Daily Mail here – genuinely used the term “death-defying” in describing his “feats” and claim that he swallows swords. I haven’t seen any video or pictures of him with a sword in his mouth (if you have some, send them this way!) so I can’t say for certain, but given that the straitjacket he uses is a gimmicked jacket and not a genuine one (industry insiders will be able to tell very quickly at a mere glance), and the fact that he is such a ridiculously laughable performer – wearing a turban, curled toe shoes and a cheesy vest nonetheless – I can’t help but suspect that his sword swallowing too is fake. As a full-time professional sword swallower myself I’m proud to know just about every other sword swallower out there, and though I can’t keep tabs on every single one, this bloke has never crossed my radar. He’s cheesy, not entertaining and not genuine – yet he still gets air time. He’s still described as death-defying. It boggles my mind. But then, look at the state of television in general, I suppose…

Actually, perhaps he can cite his performance fraud to wiggle out of the benefits fraud charges! After all, it was Warren Spencer, the prosecuting attorney, who said:

Despite this [collecting benefits for being too ill to work] he did death-defying feats such as sword swallowing, lying on beds of nails and bathing in broken glass.

I’d be happy to testify that this guy is a fraudulent entertainer and that his performance contains absolutely nothing life threatening! It might help to remove the stain that he’s left for other performing artists!

Link to Daily Mail article here.

###
[tags]Benefits System, Daredevils, Fraud, Nigel Hardman, Prince Razaq, Sideshow, Sword Swallowers, Sword Swallowing[/tags]

According to Wikipedia…

accordingtowikipediaA collection of persistent mistakes and fraudulent facts from the world’s most popular reference work.

How many times have you found yourself in a lovely yet heated discussion, feeling that you might be making some headway with your argument, only to hear the following dreaded phrase – “Weeeelll, according to Wikipedia…” – followed by a stream of apocryphal facts and sources?

Forget for a moment the questionable prudence in citing an encyclopedia as a source – after all, we all turn to it as a quick reference now and again – but with mistakes so rampant, bias so pronounced and (despite Wikipedia’s best policy efforts) the actual real world practice of scholarly correction so spotty, how can we in good conscience trust the trivia that comes spewing forth from the Grand Collaboration?

side note: I have direct experience with the sketchy nature of Wikipedia. A good friend’s well-researched entry was once removed with no explanation and replaced with a poorly written and terribly inaccurate 14 year old girl’s entry (still active), while one of my own original entries became a marketing platform for my competitors – still uncorrected years later.

Author Alex Rudzinski’s latest book, titled According to Wikipedia, was rumored to have originally been a diatribe against the collaborative encyclopedia, but realizing that he wanted more to sell books than show himself to be a bitter old curmudgeon, he revamped the work to be a collection of the most hilarious mistakes found in the online resource, accompanied by his own well-researched corrections, resulting in a book that is a delight (and a hoot) to read.

Sure, it’s good for a laugh (for instance, did you know that Earth is the largest planet in the world?) but Rudzinski is still able to work in his now subtle critiques of the service and strangely lay bare the startling implications – for history, science and public opinion – of the younger generation’s reliance upon Wikipedia.

After reading this work and having a good laugh, you’ll also agree deeply with one reviewer’s response:

“Clearly shows that having an opinion does not entitle one to express it!”

Thomas Brithwell
Times Scholar

Or Marc Fauschite’s pithy five word review:

“Is this what America thinks?”

The answer to which is, unfortunately, yes.

Some may consider the work to be a fun call back to critical thinking and research, others may enjoy it for the critique of open source collaborative culture and the dangers of letting everyone speak for themselves, but at its core According to Wikipedia is a delightful little collection of quirky mistakes and hilarious misquotes that deserves a place on everyone’s coffee table or couch-side stack of books.

###

[tags]Books, Encyclopedias, Open Source, Trivia, Web 2.0, Wikipedia[/tags]

TECH NOTE: Tools for Web Design

How to view your website in 53+ browsers on 3 major platforms in mere minutes with zero effort.

browsershotsscreenshotThough current statistics indicate that almost 62% of web users are surfing the web with some version of Internet Explorer (reaffirming that I always find myself in a minority) with Firefox coming in a distant second at around 28%, web designers need to be aware that users will be viewing their websites in a huge variety of web browsers each running on a wide cross-section of platforms. Safari and Opera are the only other browsers to regularly make the top stats lists, but there are literally dozens of browsers and platforms available.

As a business I keep close tabs on my usage statistics and sure enough, most users are visiting with some version of Internet Explorer or Firefox. Because getting my product into the marketplace is so crucial, however, I can’t afford to alienate the minority of users hitting my server with less-than-popular browsers. I need to assure that everyone receives roughly the same experience with only minor variation – if any. Some businesses by their nature may attract the minority browser – and everyone should know what the usage patterns for their websites are – and a designer can never assume that visitors are receiving the same experience that they are.


Short of running multiple systems with multiple boot options each running different OS’s and browser versions, or setting up complex and tedious virtual systems and emulators, how can a designer be certain that their website looks as intended in a cross-platform environment? My own personal approach is to first make certain that the variety of processing occurs server-side and that I deliver a minimum of code that needs to be interpreted client-side. Then, I visit browsershots.org.

What is Browsershots?

In the creator’s own words:

“Browsershots makes screenshots of your web design in different browsers. It is a free open-source online service created by Johann C. Rocholl. When you submit your web address, it will be added to the job queue. A number of distributed computers will open your website in their browser. Then they will make screenshots and upload them to the central server here.“

Simply visit the website, submit the URL that you’d like to test and select from any or all of the platforms and browsers available. Platforms include Linux, Windows and Mac OS, naturally, while the over 53 browsers include multiple versions of not only the major players but the more minor ones as well, and some decidedly obscure browsers are among the mix.

No need to test them individually, as you can submit your request for all of them at once and the results will be compiled and displayed directly on the Browsershots page in thumbnail format. Roll over each thumbnail for a slightly larger peek at how your URL appears in each given browser, or click them for a higher resolution image complete with all of the details regarding platform, browser and version. For safe keeping, you can download the whole lot of results as one zip file, including all of the high res screen shots. The site isn’t graphically pretty, but it’s extremely functional.

It should be noted that Browsershots provides only screenshots, it is impossible to test functionality. I myself discovered with one of my own sites that as a result of some transparent png’s and the way in which I made them backward compatible with older browsers, everything looked fine from IE version to IE version, but in actual fact my scrollbars were inoperative in older versions of IE – something that I could never tell from the Browsershots service.

Nonetheless, for checking visual layout it’s second to none. There are fee-based services that are available to provide the same functionality and more (see end of article for links), but for a quick, powerful and dead simple way to assure that your website appears as intended – a way which avoids the tedious setup of emulators and separate systems – Browsershots is the way to go. It also operates on the principles of distributed computing and community support, something in which I strongly believe.


Fee-Based Cross-Browser Testing Tools

-Browsercam
-Litmus
-NetMechanic

###

[tags]Browsershots, Compatibility, Firefox, Graphic Design, IE, Internet Explorer, Web Browsers, Web Design, Websites[/tags]

Twitter, TwitterWhere and Flash Mobs

A bit old according to ‘net standards – being from October, 2007 and all – but just picked this up from Casey’s blog and it got me to thinking…

TwitterWhere is an application that allows you to view Twitter Tweets by location via RSS or XML. Along with other Twitter-based apps (such as TwitterVision and TwitterMap, mentioned even on the TwitterWhere page) it’s a cool little extension of Twitter that gets geeks excited simply by being a neat remix of data.

My first thought upon seeing this was “cool, I can watch and anticipate flash mobs and the like by location!” which made me stop and consider – “Hey, anyone can watch and anticipate flash mobs by location!”

Undoubtedly some savvy government type entrenched in an office somewhere – Homeland Security, local police, et. al. – also had this “duh” moment, and maybe even wrote their own app eons ago.


Curious how the march of technology can so thoroughly enable certain activities – spontaneous congregation – and also by virtue of the community principles involved in the technology (Web 2.0 mentality, social networking, open api’s, etc…) so thoroughly short circuit it.

I don’t think that uses of Twitter for flash mobbing will go away, or that they’ll be necessarily ineffective in the future, but anyone seriously considering exploiting these tools for truly nefarious purposes has undoubtedly moved on to more promising methods.

Link to TwitterWhere

###

[tags]Flash Mobs, Smart Mobs, Twitter, TwitterWhere[/tags]

Classical Music, Showmanship and Popular Appeal
Do on-stage theatrics cheapen the art?


(note about video: My inclusion of this is a bit unfair to Lang Lang, as this is not a formal performance. Truth be told, it’s wonderful to see such joy and delight in the act of making music. Nevertheless…)

My good friend Melissa sent along an article that I missed yesterday from the New York Times.

When Histrionics Undermine the Music and the Pianist
By BERNARD HOLLAND
Another reason classical music is not reaching more young people: not because of how it sounds, but because of how it looks.

It’s a great article – but then, I’m sympathetic – and Melissa was curious to hear what I thought about it. I jotted off a quick response and, after sending, realized that it would be perfect for discussion here as well.

I’ve removed the personal details from the message and tidied it up for display on the web (adding some links and whatnot), but what you’ll read below is largely my quickly jotted thoughts on the subject.

—–
Lang Lang has for a while now been the “hot young thing” on the classical piano scene, but in truth, I’ve had a hard time appreciating him and find much more in the older performers, either now dead or significantly more mature than Lang Lang.

With the exception of Gould, I’d say that most of the performers that I revere are indeed less demonstrative (and keep in mind that I’m young – not some old fuddy-duddy with romantic thoughts of more sane times).

As a performer myself I fully and entirely – intimately, even – realize the need for theatrics. On stage, one is “putting on a show” and must deliver. Yet I can’t help but sympathize with the feelings that the author expresses and find wisdom in his questions. In the case of music – and classical music in particular – is the performance getting in the way of the music? I find it hard to believe that excessive movement would not directly impact control of expression (that’s a bit of a rhetorical statement, for everyone knows that it does), and by control I don’t mean to imply any sense of hard-nosed, tight, restricted or conservative control, but rather control of subtlety, color and refined touch – the very foundation of an artistic palette. The author himself even touches on this:

“Technique is not about muscle building but about optimal allocation of resources. More happens faster and more clearly with the minimum of gesture. Weight and relaxation, not force, make big sound. So much energy is squandered on these melodramas for the eye — and so much attention diverted — that it is a wonder our pianistic thespians can hear themselves at all. “

Instead, a hugely demonstrative player sacrifices the communicative power of his instrument – his very voice – in favor of attention grabbing communication of the self as art – not just artist.

Most classical music is marketed today not by composer or composition, but by performer, and what you purchase is not Beethoven – As Performed by Lang Lang but Lang Lang – Plays Beethoven. That’s not to say that historically the industry downplayed the performer – it didn’t, as can be seen by people specifically seeking out Rubinstein, Horowitz, et. al. … – but in this latter case, it’s typically the delivery of the work itself as presented through the mature interpretive eyes of the individual performer that listeners sought, not, as is the case today, the performer qua performer, who happens to be playing some composition or other…

Did I state that clearly?

Reminds me of a line from Marilyn Manson’s [s]AINT – “I’m not an artist, I’m a fucking work of art.” Performers today tend to be demonstrative on stage in order to sell themselves as a “fucking work of art” – regardless of what they are playing – much to the expense of the actual music – or truly authentic artistic voice, for that matter.

Its seems like reaching. Trying too hard.

Am I being too hard?

It’s not necessarily the artists that are to blame, though. It could be the general public. It’s almost a “dumbing down” of the material to appeal to a wider audience, something that is often necessary to make ends meet financially. I speak from experience here.

But then, perhaps there’s nothing wrong with being specialized and niche, a rarity to be fully appreciated by a select few and not the hoi polloi. Perhaps the classical industry is taking the wrong approach by trying to widen their net and should instead concentrate on securing their core?

Virtuoso performances are of course exceptional in many ways – the author even cites Liszt – but it’s usually without fail that the more physically expressive or unusual a performer is, the more the general public is attracted to them for non-musical reasons. The author’s use of Liszt is a perfect example, for Liszt had throngs of followers, mostly woman (though many notable men as well), who would literally swoon over him, even collect his cigar butts, following him from concert hall to concert hall, and were obviously attracted to him not for the refinement of his music – though his virtuosity undoubtedly represented some sense of power and perfection to them. Historically, the less demonstrative the virtuoso, the less widespread public following they developed, though amongst music lovers their reputations soared. The inverse for more demonstrative players.

The irony is of course as the author pointed out – today’s players may actually be alienating the general public, because their performances make them seem “weird.” Then again, he could be wrong – sales have indeed improved and the industry is not in nearly as much trouble as people commonly suspect.

To each their own, I suppose. It really is a matter of personal taste. There’s nothing wrong, in my mind, with wanting to watch a performer because you enjoy the way in which they perform. Neither is it wrong – and Gould would endorse this – in wishing to take the performer visually out of the equation because they are a distraction to the music, a barrier.

I don’t like the music, but I love watching Madonna and Michael Jackson perform. Likewise, I could care less what Stephen Kovacevich looks like or how he moves when he plays – his Beethoven sonatas sound divine.

###
[tags]artists, Bernard Holland, classical music, Lang Lang, performers, performing, piano[/tags]

Leave Your Leg at the Door
Prosthetic Limbs and Roller Coasters

protheticlimbssignforblog

This photo was recently taken at Universal Studios’ Islands of Adventure theme park. This particular one was outside of the Dueling Dragons roller coaster, but they can be seen all over the park, sometimes in variation.

The Walt Disney World theme parks have similar signs but I didn’t manage to snap photos of them.

###

[tags]Dueling Dragon, Florida, Islands of Adventure, Orlando, Prosthetic Limbs, Prosthetics, Roller Coasters, Signs, Universal Studios[/tags]

Classical Guitarist Plays With Himself on Stage and Film

Anything to get people to read, right?

In follow-up to the last post entitled Bach, Fugues and Britney Spears, I thought that I would share more of my love for the self-referential/reflexive art (would that be conceptual, perhaps? Nah… Bream has skill.) that has so influenced my own theater work, as can be evidenced in my creation and performance of Sketches, a humorous and reflexive commentary on modern art delivered through the vehicle of satire and, well, mindreading.

The literary and musical influences to which I am in debt are innumerable, but the subject of this post is the legendary classical guitarist Julian Bream. Please let me extend my apologies to Mr. Bream for potentially belittling him in the title of my post, for he has every last ounce of respect that I can possibly give. I can not say enough good things about this man and his work, and the video posted here is testament to his genius. He truly is a giant.

NOTE: This post was authored months ago but publication was delayed as a result of the above referenced video being removed from YouTube due to copyright issues. Seems that as of last month it’s back up. I do not condone copyright infringement, but this video may serve to introduce Julian Bream’s work to those as of yet unfamiliar with it. Enjoy it while it’s still up, and if you like it, purchase the video from which it’s taken – Guitarra! A Music Journey Through Spain.

Daniele mentions, over on the Classical Guitar Video Archive that “it’s a shame that YouTube plays back everything in mono sound. The original video in two audio channels showcased the distinct sounds from the two guitars of Julian Bream’s much better and made the music that much more interesting to listen to. Even with only one channel, however, this wonder piece of work still sounds amazing, so please do enjoy!”

###

[tags]Boccherini, Classical Guitar, Classical Music, Duet, Fandango, Julian Bream, Musicians, Spain, Spanish Music[/tags]

Bostrom, Sandberg and de Grey on Immortality

Back in July, Danielle Egan attended TransVision07 – the 9th annual meeting of the World Transhumanist Association – and New Scientist carries the report this month, along with a great little video interview compilation available via YouTube.

Link to the New Scientist article here – Death special: The plan for eternal life.

YouTube video interview available above.

###
[tags]Anders Sandberg, Aubrey de Grey, Immortality, Life Extension, Nick Bostrom, Transhumanism[/tags]

Think Your Olive Oil is Good for You? Think Again!

oliveoilA a staple part of the “Mediterranean Diet”, the listed health benefits of olive oil are many. From its high antioxidant count to its ability to protect against heart disease, aid in the prevention of many types of cancers and lower blood pressure, this oil – actually more of a fruit juice than an oil – is one of the chief secrets to the success of the Mediterranean diet. So why should you worry about using your olive oil? Because what claims to be extra-virgin olive oil in your kitchen cupboard may in fact be a blend of many oils from hazelnut, soybean and canola to the illegal lampante oil (“lamp oil”) made from spoiled olive fruit that has fallen from the tree and can not be legally sold as food. Companies looking to stretch their profits – and many of them very common supermarket names in the United States – cut good oils with these inferior oils, oftentimes simply substituting one for the other, then color the concoction with industrial chlorophyll, flavor it with beta-carotene, package it and sell it as quality Italian-made extra-virgin olive oil.

Thanks to Tom Mueller writing for The New Yorker, we have the full story of how these companies smuggle, repackage and skirt the law to bring inferior product to consumers at inflated prices.


With “profits … comparable to cocaine trafficking, with none of the risks“ the European Union as well as Italy itself – one of the largest producers of olive oil – have setup elaborate mechanisms to police the oil trade, most to only limited success. That said, these policing forces did manage, in 2005, to break up a “criminal ring operating in several regions of Italy, and confiscated a hundred thousand litres of fake olive oil, with a street value of six million euros (about eight million dollars).” Eight million dollars! And this is only one of the rings in operation!

In addition to the “cutting” of oils, many companies, even those otherwise ethical operations, are shipping their product to Italy for packaging so that they may – legally, mind you – place a “made in Italy” label on the bottle, artificially driving up the price of their product. Your Italian oil, if it’s olive oil at all, may in fact be from Spain – not a bad thing, save for the misrepresentation and high price.

As one who uses olive oil extensively, as both a healthy alternative to other oils as well as a gourmet treat (their’s a certain subtle – sometimes not-so-subtle – beauty in a truly good olive oil), this is a frightening revelation!

Fear not. Olive oil remains good for you and packs all of the health benefits you’ve come to expect. If your oil is from olives, of course.

Read more in Slippery Business The trade in adulterated olive oil.
###

[tags]Bertolli, Fasanesi, lampante, mediterranean diet, Nestlé, olive oil, Unilever[/tags]

All Sorts of Linky Goodness

crosspostertwooh
The unexpected success of the WordPress to Myspace Crossposter has left me delighted and happy that, when I have downtime, I still have a fun little pet project to work on that is actually of some use. Of course, the continued development of the plugin wouldn’t happen if it weren’t for the many people who have begun using the code. So, in thanks to some of those who implemented it early, left insightful and useful comments or otherwise tossed in their two cents, I’m providing a short list of some of the blogs that I’ve managed to scare up that have contributed by being great users and testers.

Burning Corpse STARKILLA
teknobot.co.uk Gair y Gwynt / Wind Words
Daniel Spisak on Technology Gnome in the Garden
Shamus Writes Jaki Levy
Amanita.net Pink Ray Gun
GaragePunk.com My Geek Blog
Star Wreck Urban Landscapes
Dirtymitten.com Mama’s Bloggin
hummingcrow: one squall voice Fort Collins Art Webzine
WhatTheCast? The Mimetiks
erock.org Brian Leon Mays
zenandjuice.com Sadrhino
Carriep63.com Raintraders Blog
stevenrutledge.com Ideas for better PC
Celtic Rock Music Lost in Technology
FXetc.com Wiggy’s Weblog
X-FADE.ORG No Categories
Matt Vapor’s Blog The Don Fiore
Paperwork Nissan Fan Blog

This list is by no means exhaustive and if you are using the plugin and would like to be on it, please drop me a line. I’d be happy to provide a link back to your site.

Of course, I appreciate links too, so if you have the time, space and inclination, I would be honored if you linked back to my blog, and perhaps directly to the plugin page so that others can find it and use it as well.

The views expressed by the websites above are solely those of the individual authors and do not reflect or represent the views of this blog or author.

###
[tags]crosspost plugin, crossposting, curl, links,beta testers,kudos,blogging, myspace, myspace access class, myspace crossposting, myspace plugin, php, ping, pinging, plugin, wordpress, wp[/tags]

A Magician After My Own Heart

marx
The Summer 2007 issue of Cabinet Magazine features an article by two London-based authors, Sally O’Reilly and Ian Saville, entitled I Can See Your Ideology Moving. From the start it grabs the reader with its droll humour, setting the scene as follows:

    The scene: A windy seaside town in England. An arts festival (entitled, perhaps pretentiously, The Windy Seaside Town Biennale) is in full swing. An audience of skeptical locals, theater-seat-radicals and bloodthirsty performance-art lovers, sated after fish and chips and lashings of warm ale, is watching a man speaking to a picture of Karl Marx. More unusually, the picture speaks back to the man, for this is Ian Saville, socialist magician and ventriloquist, demonstrating his revolutionary art.
    At the back of the hall, the art critic Sally O’Reilly watches curiously, almost unable to contain the questions that crowd her mind. The audience is laughing …

Not only does the story continue on to introduce the characters of Engels and Brecht – you have to adore anyone that can conjure such figures to not only prove a point but to provide humour – it more importantly serves to introduce us to the still-living figure of Ian Saville who, as it turns out, is a very real performer that has been performing a very real show, a “socialist magic act”, for the past 25 years.

I can report on nothing more than the impressions that I’ve received from reading the article, Mr. Saville’s website and watching the introduction to his show on YouTube (available via his site), but all that I’ve seen indicates that this is a hilarious, intelligent and very British show that should be getting much more attention than it has to date.

Nevertheless, Mr. Saville has garnered some tremendous reviews, such as:

    “Would make the hardest liner laugh …. Ideologically sound and magnificently bonkers.”

    -The Independent

    “Ian Saville’s one-man show is a gloriously witty and consummately theatrical manifestation of what could become a whole new concept in political theatre. [...] Saville has taken the tired old tricks of the magic brigade and given them a whole new subversive meaning….An astoundingly funny display.”

    -Time Out

Magnificently bonkers! A whole new subversive meaning! Great quotes, and only two of very many found on his website.

His shows have also won numerous awards, and he’s performed in some bizarre and grandiose venues, from picket lines to the Royal Albert Hall!


Though his Magic for Socialism website is not much to look at, and his awards and 25 year resume have not attracted the attention of the broader media – at least on this side of the pond – I for one pay my respect to anyone that successfully performs a show that bears the title Brecht on Magic.

Kudos to Ian Saville for creating, performing and continually pushing forward with such an unusual show for so many years. One has to wonder if it’s even possible to do here in the States.

Find Ian Saville’s Magic For Socialism website here.

Many thanks to Cabinet Magazine for the original article.

See also Private Thoughts and Other Lies for more politically and socially motivated magic.

*photo: Ian Saville holding his talking picture of Karl Marx. Photos Jonathan Allen. Via Cabinet Magazine website.
###

[tags]Bertolt Brecht, Brecht, Brecht on Magic, british comedy, Cabinet Magazine, Ian Saville, Karl Marx, magic, Marx, performance art, Sally O’Reilly, socialism[/tags]