A Look at Language

Doing Our Own ThingThe recent rash of mainstream books declaring the downfall of the American mind – intellectually, culturally, philosophically and emotionally – is nothing new. Bloom’s The Closing of the American Mind, from 1988, made the case very clear, and one can trace from Bloom’s sources a long lineage of such declaration and claim.

Yet whether it be my present position within the American culture or my recent sudden and unexpected interest in the state of mind of the country (as a result of our current political administration and their questionable actions, I am sure), I have found these often fanatical texts to be of extreme interest and relevance today.

One such text that I read some months back was John McWhorter’s Doing Our Own Thing: The Degradation of Language and Music and Why We Should, Like, Care.

What is most surprising throughout this text is the relaxed and often humorous style of McWhorter’s own writing. One would expect an expert in any field who is explicating the downfall of the rigor and style of that very field to take potshots at those responsible for the decline. One would naturally expect McWhorter, from the very subtitle on the cover, to poke fun at those people in society who utilize and perpetuate such loose language. Yet McWhorter’s humor is created by his reflection of a society that he not only observes, but actively participates in. McWhorter himself uses modern linguistic styling with sincerity, and uses them so effectively that there is enormous rapport between himself and any reader who is even slightly in touch with today’s culture. As any true linguist would be, he is less disappointed in the so-called “downfall” of language than he is fascinated; and one can sense that he is himself reveling in the change.

McWhorter’s primary argument, among the many resultant effects, is that language in America has ceased to be a language of which we are proud and with which we seek to speak artfully. Modern American English, he claims, has become simply a tool, and since the 1960′s (where he locates a few primary reasons for the language revolution) has been transitioning from a well-written and considered language to a strictly spoken language.

Whereas we still have the written word in society, in the form of books, papers, journals and even email, these print media are themselves printing words in a decidedly oral style, and he forecasts the continued decline of print media.

McWhorter goes on to outline and lament (despite his acceptance and fascination) the decline and fall not only of language in print and speech, but also in music. A huge fan of classic show tunes, McWhorter discusses the transition from classic compositional styles to the rhythm-driven and vocal-styling-obsessed culture of today.

Whereas some have viewed McWhorter’s words in a negative light, convinced that he is attacking all that is sacred to the youth of today, I have found quite the contrary. He eloquently sets forth his argument, but never does he attack or belittle. The author’s predilections are clearly in evidence and one is delighted to get such a personal glimpse into the life of this seemingly fun-loving individual, yet for that reason, some readers have assumed that any view not in alignment with his own are frowned upon. This would be a misinformed and egoistic stance.

An easy, humorous and accessible text, Doing Our Own Thing is a relaxed look at the evolution of language in modern society, as told through the words of an intelligent and playful critic. Highly recommended.

John McWhorter,Doing Our Own Thing,The Degradation of Language and Music, Language, Linguistics

Art is Inherently Controversial

Too lazy to dig through my endless stacks of old periodicals, I found myself searching the web for an archived article in Gramophone magazine that featured an interview with pianist Helene Grimaud. I recalled having read the interview and thought that she had an exceptionally healthy attitude towards life and her art and I wanted to write about it.

During said search I stumbled upon an old essay by Lara St. John, the young Canadian violinist who has impressed the world with her talent and turned many gray-haired classical music aficionados into drooling, gawking half-wits with her stunning good looks. Continue reading

No Dessert Until You Finish Your Dinner

We all remember as children being told that we can’t have dessert unless we finish our dinner. And while the obedient child would, wincing and whining all the while, scrub his plate clean, the desperate and rebellious child would hide his lima beans in his napkin (while the smart one would sneak it onto his sister’s plate, leaving no evidence to dispose of) with the hopes of reaping the reward without paying his dues.

Whereas we don’t all share the same memories, (my family would have regarded lima beans as too exotic, being a poor potatoes and sometimes-meat family) we can all relate to the sentiment, in one way or another, of wanting to get something for nothing. But as Robert Heinlein said, “There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch”. This concept of instant gratification and reward without work has, unfortunately for many of us, carried over into our adulthood, and it is now affecting the very structure and function of that most remarkable of human tools; the brain.

The September 16th, 2004 edition of The Economist contains a report entitled Supercharging the brain: New drugs promise to improve memory and sharpen mental response. As a former advocate of nootropics this caught my attention. What new classes of drugs were being developed and tested, and in what ways were they modifying our brain chemistry to achieve the desired results? But more intriguing to me now, in contrast to what I and others would have considered of interest only ten years ago, was the second portion of the title; Who should be allowed to take them? A fundamentally moral question.

The Economist reports that there are over 40 potential cognitive enhancers that are currently in development, and the cover story of Newsweek, – The Quest for Memory Drugs by Mary Carmichael – the week of November 29th, 2004, states that some of these new drugs could be available in as little as two years.

While most of these new drugs are aimed at restoring proper memory functions to those patients with clinical Mild Cognitive Impairment and those with Alzheimer’s disease, there is undoubtedly the temptation to utilize them to enhance the normal functionality of a healthy individual. In fact, many drugs are already being utilized on a regular basis to do just that, and by our very own government.

For almost three quarters of a century, American soldiers, and especially pilots, have been using amphetamines to keep themselves awake and alert for extended periods. These drugs, most notably dextroamphetamine, have not been employed by soldiers illicitly either; they are approved and endorsed by the U.S. Armed Services. One of the drugs that has come out of these memory and performance enhancement research labs, modafinil, has been authorized as an alternative to amphetamines. DARPA continues to support multiple research studies for increasingly more effective stimulants and memory enhancers.

There is the question, however, of potential long-term damage to the brain after prolonged use of these drugs.

The November 12th, 2003 edition of Yale Daily News reports on a study in its own industry journal, Neuron, that claims that drugs that work by varying the levels of protein kinase A, a technique employed in one form or another by many of the new drugs, could have long-term detrimental effects. Not all of the new drugs utilize this method, however, but long-term effects of these others remain to be seen.

Long-term effects and current government use aside, the real question remains, who should use such drugs? Or more to the point, should healthy people use such drugs?

Nobody doubts that many companies are eager to bring a memory enhancing pill to the general public. Who wouldn’t want to be able to score higher on exams or remember names, dates, faces and appointments with ease? Dr. Scott Small of CUMC, in Newsweek, put it best:

There’s a question of whether we should be in the business of making memory boosters in the first place. Once we’re in a gray area we at least need to be careful. With people who are impaired by a subtle but real change in their brain function, we might not want to sit in judgment and say ‘No, we can’t help you.’ But the fact that a high-school student can’t do well on the SAT – is that a disease?

Is it a disease, indeed? The truth is, we have all become lazy, and the memory pill that many are seeking is a quick fix, the lazy man’s way out. And this one fact renders all debate about who should use the memory pills moot. The pills should be reserved only for those with actual, diagnosed cognitive impairment. Though even the diagnosis is a gray area. Just take a look at other pharmaceutical fixes in our society. How many children really have ADD and need to take Ritalin, or is it an over diagnosed condition? How many adults really need Prozac or Paxil? Have we become a dependent society? I don’t think that the question even needs to be asked. Take away our pills and people will actually have to, brace yourself, deal with their problems!

Memory is indeed a very complicated aspect of the mind. But any healthy American with a “normal” memory can improve it one hundred-fold simply by learning how to learn. No miracle pills, no fad diets, no special exercises.

Everyone is familiar with the claims made of the ancient Greek memory. They were said to have been able to remember oodles of information. And it’s not difficult, even in today’s society that endorses not remembering a thing!

As an individual who employs memory professionally in my work, I know firsthand that this is possible. I was not born with a gift; I have not taken a special pill. My enhanced memory is the result of my own efforts to learn. What I do onstage – memorizing dictionaries, memorizing decks of cards and other demonstrations designed to impress and mystify – is all based on one very simple secret: that memorizing pi to 1000 digits is not really that hard. But people believe that it is. That is the only reason that I remain employed in this field! My secret it out.

I and other memory experts have often said that good memory can be broken down into three very simple categories:

- Attention
- Retention
- Recall

But most Americans fail miserably on the very first count.

It is my opinion that today’s pharmacologically foolish society is achieving the exact opposite of what they set out to do. Rather than create a society of individuals that are well-adjusted, healthy citizens with advanced mental capabilities, the United States and its endorsement and support of pharmaceutical giants (American or otherwise) is creating instead a culture of dependent, neurotic individuals who are lazy and self-centered with misplaced priorities who simply can not function without the assistance of drugs.

Though I do take issue with corporate America, I am speaking here not from a position of corporate intolerance, but rather, one of disillusionment in the direction and behavior of humans as humans.

Humanity has remarkable potential. The human brain and body can achieve the extraordinary, right now. But how can we move positively into the future and develop even further, if we are not willing and able to invest effort into the evolution of our very own self, with effort, attention and genuine mindfulness?

What Americans need is a return to the self, not another pill.

MORE USEFUL LINKS
Use Your Perfect Memory – Tony Buzan
The Memory Book – Harry Lorayne

All you need to develop a stellar memory that will put even a doped up memory buff to shame is the work of the above two authors. Read it, learn it and above all, apply it. Though I mention dictionaries, cards and pi in the above article, those are merely stunts. Contained in these books are very practical techniques for remembering any type of information at all, and it will undoubtedly have positive impact on your daily life, regardless of age, background or education, if you only try.

Tony Buzan, Harry Lorayne, memory, nootropics, smart drugs, dextroamphetamine, cognitive enhancement, modafinil, DARPA, mnemonics

The Thresher

Every so often, though with decreasing frequency these days, a journal appears in print that is subversive enough to balance delicately on the edge of mainstream yet backed by enough money to warrant a glossy cover. These journals are occasionally found in the large chain bookstores, a few copies buried amongst their larger, less inflammatory brethren. And it was in just such a location that I, with eyes wide with delight, recently discovered a copy of The Thresher, sporting a wide variety of goodness on the cover ranging from Surgical Deprogramming and Meth-Sick Goddesses to Madness & Mysticism and Scientologists Punked!

My eyes continued their expressive posturing by welling with tears when I spotted the name of the editor on the inside cover: R.U. Sirius

R.U. Sirius is perhaps best known for his alternative tech magazine Mondo 2000, which starting in 1989 began glamorized the then rising geek-scene and reported (though I use the term loosely) on the formerly fringe scenes of nootropics, life-extension, human augmentation and a host of other similar issues.

It has been quite a few years since my former life as a cryotransport technician and my involvement with the budding transhumanist movement, and as I stared down at R.U.’s name on the inside cover of this journal I sensed a sort of home sickness, seeing a name that was so near and dear to me that also represented a scene with which I hadn’t cavorted in years. I realized then that there was still some nagging need to pursue these former obsessions, albeit with a radically new point of view.

And as it turns out, R.U. himself admits to having drifted away from the “scene”, as I’ll call it.
Shift.com states in their introduction to an interview with R.U. back in 2002:

“Sirius hardly goes online anymore, except for research. The truth is, the Godfather of GeekChic has moved on.”

Yet his writing is still as relevant and interesting as ever, and I was delighted to discover by sheer happenstance this issue, now in its third volume.

But as it stands, the fun stops there, with issue three, for I am unable, despite my best efforts, to locate any current information about the journal.

The website itself is displayed prominently on the back of the journal: www.thethresher.com. Anyone visiting the site will be sorely disappointed to discover that it in fact does not exist.

A WHOIS search of the domain turns up the following:

Domain Name: THETHRESHER.COM
Registrar: WOOHO T & C CO., LTD. D/B/A RGNAMES.COM
Whois Server: whois.rgnames.com
Referral URL: http://www.rgnames.com
Name Server: NS.BUYDOMAINS.COM
Name Server: THIS-DOMAIN-FOR-SALE.COM
Status: ACTIVE
Updated Date: 27-oct-2004
Creation Date: 21-oct-2004
Expiration Date: 21-oct-2005

and a search for the publisher, David Latimer and Altar Inc., turns up absolutely no information relevant to any future plans for the journal.

There are plenty of interviews with R.U. Sirius, yet not a single one is more recent than 2003, and everything seems to indicate that beyond his book Counterculture Through the Ages : From Abraham to Acid House, published only last month, R.U. is involved only in a project called NeoFiles, a website that seems to focus on interviews with such thinkers as NLP co-creator Richard Bandler and Extropy Institute founder Max More, and appears to be run by a life-extension supplement manufacturer by the name of Life Enhancement.

There is hope, however. The third and thus far last issue of The Thresher went to print in 2003, and despite the fact that the magazine itself states that it is:

“published (approximately) tri-annually”

which would mean that we should have seen more issues by now, R.U. is himself quoted as calling it a “yearly journal”.

With any luck, The Thresher has not mysteriously disappeared in the style of the nuclear sub carrying the same name, and rather than find it buried at 8000 feet, we’ll once again see its glossy cover gracing the shelves at newsstands; or at least crammed tightly between its larger, more PC cousins.

MORE INTERVIEWS WITH R.U. SIRIUS
San Francisco Chronicle
betterPropadanda
BETTERHUMANS
ctheory.net – very old, from ’96

RU Sirius, The Thresher, MondoGlobo, NeoFiles, RU Sirius Show

Sudden Noises

Sudden Noise from Inanimate ObjectsSeveral weeks ago the local alternative newspaper Seven Days ran two articles in the same issue that, despite their lack of explicit connection, nevertheless seemed to betray an intimate association.

The first article concerned an eccentric local composer named David Gunn. The second was a review of the book Sudden Noises from Inanimate Objects by the now local writer Christopher Miller, though I have since learned that he was not local when he authored the text.

My suspicion was that Miller had actually used Gunn as inspiration for his novel, and quite a wonderful novel it was, I might add.

I wrote up an article, intending to publish it in the Seven Days letters section, but it turned out to be far too long for inclusion. As I was feeling much too lazy to edit it down to a shorter length, I simply sent it to Christopher Miller and called it a day.

Included herein is the complete text of the article. I have also appended a short postscript which lays to rest the question posed in the text.

The original review and interview with the author can be viewed on the Seven Days website: Composition Book by Margot Harrison

I was unable to locate the article about Gunn on the Seven Days website, but it appears to be on the Rutland Herald website as well: Fun with music

It should be noted again, since the article was originally written for a local audience, that both Gunn and Miller are residents of Vermont, and this is what fueled my theory.

Gunning Down Silber by Roderick Russell

Reading Seven Days each week is always a great delight for me, so much so that I sometimes jump the gun and prematurely pick up a copy that I, only two paragraphs into a delightful article, suddenly realize I have already read.

So I wasn’t entirely surprised this week while reading Volume 10, Number 9 to experience an intense feeling of deja vu while deeply ensconced in the Musical Mayhem story about VT composer David Gunn.

I double checked the date, ran through my mental checklist of what I had read and where, and concluded that this was in fact the first time I had read the article. So why the deja vu? After much searching, I realized that I was reading a real-life account of a fictional character featured in a novel that I had only last month completed.

Sudden Noises from Inanimate Objects is a delightfully ridiculous novel about the fictional composer Simon Silber, a review of which also coincidentally appeared further on in the same issue of Seven Days. I need not describe it here, for Margot Harrison did a great job reviewing it for the paper and also included a short interview with the author. And for a truly accurate picture of the novel, all one need do is read the Musical Mayhem article, inflate and exaggerate as any good storyteller would, and you’ve got a novel on your hands.

So the question becomes, though the author Miller never once mentions Gunn in any place that I have found, nor does Gunn mention Miller, do they in fact know each other? Could Miller have found inspiration for his brilliant first novel in an eccentric character from Barre, VT?

It seems hard to believe that the shortest composition in the novel, entitled Crows, was not influenced by Gunn’s own shortest composition, 50 Birds. And though it doesn’t take a comic genius to create composition titles such as Help Me Rondo and Transcendental Medication, both by Gunn, orVariation in a Minor and “Babbage” Permutations by Miller (okay, perhaps the latter two are genius) and to discover similarities between them, the parallels between the fictional character Silber and the very real character Gunn remain too numerous to overlook.

Both composers are highly concerned with meticulous and exacting recreation of their music. Granted, it could be argued that many composers are concerned with the representation of their artistic ideals, but Miller himself writes into his novel that Silber composes only for the solo piano “because he didn’t trust anyone else to interpret his works.” Compare that to Gunn’s admission that, though he is proud that the VYO was able to present his Incandescendence at the Flynn, they did so “32 percent faster than I had written it.” Not twice as fast, not simply “faster”, but precisely 32 percent. Perhaps there’s some hidden reference to the number of Goldberg Variations1 or the year of Glenn Gould’s birth that I’m missing there, but being so exacting deserves to be called “pulling a Silber”.

With both composers being characterized overwhelmingly by the “various states of oblivion” in which they live and their concern for meticulous recreation of their musical ideas, along with other countless similarities, one can only assume that Miller used Gunn as a basis for his novel.

Mind you, I am certain that Gunn is a great man with wonderful ideas. Any fictional representation of him is naturally, as any good caricature will, going to creatively inflate the circumstances. It just so happens that in some caricatures, the comically large nose really isn?t that different from the original. If anything, the article in Seven Days and the similarities I’ve discovered have encouraged me to explore this real-life character more. I only wonder if in fact Gunn was Miller’s muse on this project.

In any event, the novel is fantastic and an absolute hoot, especially for cynical-minded music lovers, and I highly recommend it to everyone. Kudos to Miller on a wonderful first novel.

1. In true Silber fashion, I should note that technically there are only 30 variations in the Goldbergs, but that the Aria is typically played once at the beginning and once at the end, leaving us with 32 separate selections.

POSTSCRIPT

Mr. Miller was kind enough to give me a wonderful little response to my article which put to rest any debate about Gunn’s possible inspirational role in the creation of the book. I hope that Mr. Miller doesn’t mind if I briefly quote him below:

Any resemblance between Silber and Gunn is just further proof that it’s impossible to satirize modern music because the reality is wackier than anything I could dream up.

Miller also commented that he was living in St. Louis at the time of the writing, and had actually never heard of Gunn.

Thank you for settling the argument Christopher. Keep putting pen to paper and cranking out those delightful words!

Sudden Noises from Inanimate Objects, Seven Days VT, David Gunn, music, composers, Simon Silber, Christopher Miller, Vermont Youth Orchestra