The Lost Point of the Program
Koppel and Company on The Lost Tomb of Jesus

March 5th, 2007 by Roderick Russell

The Lost Tomb of JesusOn the evening of March 4, 2007 I, undoubtedly along with millions of others, watched a program aired on the Discovery Channel directed by documentary filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici entitled The Lost Tomb of Jesus.

The program explores the question of whether a tomb, known as the Tomb of the Ten Ossuaries, uncovered by construction workers in Jerusalem in 1980 while erecting a new apartment complex, could possibly be the tomb of Jesus of Nazareth and his family.

A truly engaging and compelling production, this film presented a wide range of evidence to support the claim, though it drew no conclusions. Instead, it was very clear to point out that no agreement has been reached – not only through its content but also by disclaimers both before and after the program aired – amongst scholars, scientists and archeologists and encouraged the viewer to apply their own critical faculty while watching and considering the evidence put forth.

Following the program was an hour-long discussion, hosted and moderated by Ted Koppel and featuring Simcha Jacobovici himself as one of several panelists. What ensued seemed more an hour-long attack upon the conclusions that Mr. Jacobovici drew - led by Mr. Koppel as ringmaster, a supposedly unbiased moderator – and criticism of his techniques.

The astonishing reality is that those doing the attacking – and again, this included Koppel – did not seem to understand that Mr. Jacobovici had not drawn any conclusions. He will be the first to tell you, and did so in direct response to a question from Koppel, that he feels strongly that he’s made a compelling case – compelling enough to warrant further investigation.

Simcha Jacobovici is a documentary filmmaker and is exceedingly clear in stating that he is not an archeologist, scientist or theologian. He has done some remarkable work with this latest project, but it amounts to nothing more than having brought questions to the fore and created an environment for debate, something that he posited as one of his goals.

Despite his own personal feelings or beliefs, it seems to me that Mr. Jacobovici has gone to great lengths to make it clear that more work needs to be done – unfortunately Koppel and crew did not want to hear it, and instead reacted to the film as if it were a personal attack upon their own beliefs, which it was not.

Most astonishing is that one of the key objections brought forth by Koppel and the theologians on the panel is that the dramatizations found throughout the film were compelling, powerful and persuasive. Mr. Jacobovici took the charges of compelling and powerful as a compliment, and well he should as a filmmaker, but by no means were they any more persuasive than any other visual imagery, and in fact paled in comparison to some of the glitz and glam persuasion found in modern news casting – something that Koppel himself seems to forget. And lest Koppel try to claim that his own show is stripped down, barebones and presents the raw truth through fact and not persuasion, let me just mention that authority is one of the biggest persuaders, and that is in fact the feel that he often tries to project.

How ironic that the theologians that so adamantly defend the stories of the bible and that most accomplished of storytellers, Jesus of Nazareth, should find such fault with a filmmaker and his own successful telling of tales. In fact, Mr. Jacobovici’s tales are enormously less sinister than biblical parables, for he is only showing us what may have been, rather than attempting to persuade us of what is. My prediction – or is that prophesy – is that Simcha Jacobovici will be the next one crucified for being a powerful communicator.

In the end, this film was intended to spark debate, encourage more research and hopefully inspire researchers to seek the truth through science and historical inquiry. Let us not forget that The Lost Tomb of Jesus is compelling – not concluding. The film presents a case, supplies available evidence and entertains us through good direction along the way. It does not claim to be complete, exhaustive or the last word on the subject. Never does it put forth a conclusion – in fact, it encourages the viewer to seek the answers. Simcha Jacobovici and producer James Cameron have created a wonderful work of documentary filmmaking and I applaud them for their efforts. Mr. Koppel - and all others that would attack this film, its director and producers – stop chasing the investigator and get back to the investigation.

###

POSTSCRIPT: I feel particularly blessed (oh what a curious turn of phrase) that I’ve been traveling and isolated from the media surrounding this film and the controversy that it has kicked up. I was able to watch the program with a completely fresh and unbiased mind, but had I read such damning articles such as the one in the Washington Post entitled ‘Lost Tomb of Jesus’ Claim Called a Stunt, and countless other negative articles, I too may have been biased straight out of the gate. Thankfully this was not the case, but I fear that Mr. Koppel may have been swept away by the current of the popular media. I was particularly happy when he made his move to Discovery and have followed his work with pleasure, but found myself for the first time disappointed in him while watching the discussion that he hosted. I can only hope that this is only one slip-up in his otherwise insightful programs.

Many sources claim that the entire archaeological community is in stark disagreement with Jacobovici, but there is yet to be a clear exposition of why. What we need is clear communication and, above all else, further investigation. Perhaps this is all simply a stunt designed to generate money (that’s a big $4 million investment though) - and if it is, I still applaud Jacobovici and Cameron for one hell of a media manipulation - but I maintain that nothing will be accomplished unless we stop attacking the investigators and get back to the investigation.

tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

One Response to “The Lost Point of the Program
Koppel and Company on The Lost Tomb of Jesus

  1. M Says:

    From what you say, I kind of wish that I had stayed up to see the Koppel program afterwards. Unfortunately, while the film started off highly engaging, I lost interest in the second hour and ended sleeping through the conclusion. (Much as I did when they discovered that additional chamber in the Pyramid of Giza. Also, a lot of interesting hype for a highly unsatisfactory climax; or lack there of.)

    What I found noteworthy was the Christian gentleman that was interviewed who was capable of comfortably reconciling the possibility of physical findings with his faith. (I wish I could remember his name.) Kudos to at least one person to approaching a controversial subject with both open-mindedness and grace, combined with unshakable faith.

    What I found fascinating, subject of religion aside, was the archaeological & genealogical processes. While we know that film was dramatized and the science “dumbed down” for easier consumption of the masses, it whets the appetite for historical interest. How exciting it must be to live in a city with such historical context that one of the most publicized discoveries takes place on your own patio… Makes me want to go out in the back yard and dig for arrowheads!

Leave a Reply



Top incoming search terms for this post

 program (23)  lost point (2)  'lost tomb of jesus' (1)  last tomb of jesus (1)  Simcha Jacobovici koppel (1)  koppel simcha (1)  noumenon film (1)  engaging the lost tomb of Jesus (1)  jesus tomb (1)  the lost pyramid casting crew (1)